College Athletes as Employees? College Athletes Being Paid.

The Law Offices of James L. Arrasmith

Introduction

The landscape of college athletics in the United States stands on the brink of a seismic shift. On July 11, 2024, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit ruled in Johnson v. NCAA that could fundamentally alter the relationship between student-athletes and their institutions. This comprehensive article delves into the details of this landmark decision, its legal foundations, and the potentially far-reaching implications for college sports, focusing on how it might affect states with prominent athletic programs like California.

As we navigate through the complexities of this ruling, we’ll explore its historical context, examine the legal arguments at play, and consider the various stakeholders’ perspectives across the collegiate sports landscape. This decision has ignited a debate that could reshape the future of college athletics in America from the courts to the campuses, from athletes to administrators.

1. The Third Circuit’s Groundbreaking Ruling

In a decision that sent shockwaves through the world of college sports, the

The Third Circuit affirmed the dismissal of the NCAA’s motion to dismiss in Johnson v. NCAA. The court’s ruling allows college athletes to be classified as employees under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and state laws.

The court emphasized the need for a test to differentiate between students who play college sports recreationally and those whose efforts “cross the legal line into work.” This distinction lies at the heart of the ongoing debate about the nature of college athletics and student-athletes status.

2. The Case at Hand: Johnson v. NCAA

The Johnson v. NCAA case, led by former Villanova football player Ralph “Trey” Johnson, represents athletes from over a dozen Division I schools. The plaintiffs argue that their athletic activities constitute work separate from their studies, and the control exerted over their time and labor qualifies them as employees under applicable legal tests.

This case challenges the NCAA’s long-standing position that college athletes are primarily students, not employees. The plaintiffs contend that the economic reality of their relationship with their schools and the NCAA is that of an employee-employer dynamic.

The Third Circuit’s ruling in Johnson v. NCAA doesn’t exist in a vacuum. It builds upon and, in some ways, contradicts previous legal decisions. Let’s examine some key precedents:

  1. NCAA v. Alston (2021): In this landmark Supreme Court case, the Court unanimously ruled that the NCAA’s restrictions on education-related benefits for student-athletes violated antitrust law. Justice Kavanaugh’s concurring opinion suggested that the NCAA’s other compensation rules might also violate antitrust laws.
  2. Berger v. NCAA (7th Circuit, 2016): In this case, the court rejected the claim that student-athletes were employees under the FLSA. The Third Circuit explicitly disagreed with aspects of this ruling.
  3. Dawson v. NCAA (9th Circuit, 2019): Similar to Berger, this case also ruled against classifying student-athletes as employees. The Third Circuit’s decision creates a circuit split on this issue.
  4. O’Bannon v. NCAA (9th Circuit, 2015): While not directly about employee status, this case challenged the NCAA’s rules prohibiting student-athletes from receiving compensation for the use of their names, images, and likenesses.

The Third Circuit’s ruling acknowledged these precedents but emphasized that the legal landscape has evolved, particularly in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in NCAA v. Alston.

Related Terms: natural resources defense council, official acts, federal government, federal agencies, student-led, official proceeding, amendment challenges, absolute immunity, unusual punishment

4. The Economic Realities Test

A crucial aspect of the Third Circuit’s ruling is its instruction to apply an “economic realities” test grounded in common-law agency principles. This test considers whether athletes:

  1. Perform services for another party
  2. Do so primarily for the college’s benefit
  3. Are under the college’s control
  4. Receive express or implied compensation or in-kind benefits

This test departs from the “primary beneficiary” test previously applied in similar cases and could significantly impact how courts evaluate the employee status of student-athletes in the future.

5. Potential Financial Implications

The financial repercussions could be substantial if college athletes are deemed employees under the FLSA. They would be entitled to at least minimum wage for their labor and eligible for overtime pay. This could result in the NCAA and colleges being ordered to pay millions of dollars in unpaid wages and force a fundamental restructuring of amateurism rules.

The plaintiffs’ attorney, Paul McDonald, has suggested that athletes might make $2,000 per month or $10,000 per year for participating in NCAA sports. While these figures are speculative, they provide a sense of the potential compensation scale.

6. The NCAA as a Joint Employer

Another significant aspect of the Johnson case is the argument that the NCAA should be considered a joint employer. This classification is based on colleges following workplace rules set and enforced by the NCAA. If accepted, this could make the NCAA responsible for paying athletes if colleges fail, adding another layer of complexity to the situation.

7. Comparing Athletes to Work-Study Students

One compelling argument made by the plaintiffs is the comparison between student-athletes and their peers in work-study programs. They point out that some work-study students are paid for jobs like working at concession stands or ticket gates during games where the athletes are not compensated. This comparison highlights the perceived inequity in the current system.

8. Control and Restrictions on College Athletes

The Third Circuit judges noted the significant control colleges exert over athletes compared to other students. Athletes face more constraints in course selection and significant choices due to their athletic obligations. They also face restrictions on activities like hiring agents, which don’t apply to students pursuing careers in music, drama, or the arts.

This level of control is a key factor in the argument for employee status, as it resembles the kind of oversight typically seen in employer-employee relationships.

9. Potential for Discovery and Public Scrutiny

If the Johnson case proceeds to pretrial discovery, it could lead to unprecedented public scrutiny of college athletics. FLSA discovery tends to be public-facing, potentially requiring college officials, coaches, and staff to share materials like time sheets and practice schedules and answer questions under oath about athlete work.

This level of transparency could have far-reaching implications for how college athletic programs operate and are perceived by the public.

10. Implications for California’s College Athletics

For California, home to numerous high-profile college athletic programs, this ruling could have significant implications:

  1. Financial Impact: California universities may need to budget for potential back pay and future wages for athletes.
  2. Competitive Landscape: The ruling could affect recruiting dynamics, potentially giving California schools an advantage if they can offer employment benefits before other states.
  3. Legal Compliance: California institutions may need to rapidly adjust their policies to comply with employment laws regarding student-athletes.
  4. State Legislation: California, known for its progressive stance on athlete rights (e.g., the “Fair Pay to Play Act”), may need to consider new legislation in light of this ruling.

11. The Circuit Split and Potential Supreme Court Intervention

The Third Circuit’s ruling creates a circuit split with the Seventh and Ninth Circuits, which previously rejected claims that college athletes were FLSA employees. This disagreement among circuit courts increases the likelihood that the U.S. Supreme Court may eventually take up the issue.

Given this issue’s nationwide importance and its potential to fundamentally alter the landscape of college athletics, Supreme Court intervention could provide much-needed clarity and uniformity across the country.

The Third Circuit emphasized that the legal landscape has evolved since earlier rulings, citing the Supreme Court’s decision in NCAA v. Alston and the National Labor Relations Board’s position that college athletes may be employees under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA).

This acknowledgment of the changing legal context suggests that courts are increasingly willing to reconsider long-held assumptions about student-athletes’ status.

13. Parallel Developments: The Dartmouth Case and Beyond

The Johnson ruling doesn’t exist in isolation. Other recent developments include:

  1. Dartmouth Case: A National Labor Relations Board regional director found Dartmouth College men’s basketball players to be employees under the NLRA, leading to their unionization (though the school is appealing).
  2. USC Case: An administrative law judge in Los Angeles is considering whether USC football and men’s and women’s basketball players are employees within the meaning of the NLRA.

These parallel cases demonstrate that student-athlete employment status is being contested on multiple fronts.

14. Looking Ahead: Potential Outcomes and Challenges

As the Johnson case returns to the district court, several potential outcomes and challenges loom:

  1. If athletes are deemed employees, it could fundamentally change the nature of college sports.
  2. The NCAA and member institutions may face significant financial liabilities.
  3. The case could take years to resolve, potentially reaching the Supreme Court fully.
  4. Colleges must navigate complex issues, including FERPA obligations, to notify current and former student-athletes about the case.

The resolution of this case could have profound implications for the future of college athletics, potentially reshaping the relationship between athletes, schools, and sports governing bodies.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

  1. Q: What exactly did the Third Circuit rule in Johnson v. NCAA? A: The court ruled that college athletes whose efforts primarily benefit their schools may qualify as employees deserving pay under federal wage-and-hour laws. It also ordered the district court to apply an “economic realities” test to determine employee status.
  2. Q: Does this ruling mean all college athletes will now be paid? A: No, the ruling doesn’t automatically make athletes employees. It calls for a test to determine which athletes’ efforts “cross the legal line into work.”
  3. Q: How does this ruling differ from the recent NIL (Name, Image, Likeness) changes? A: NIL allows athletes to profit from their brand, while this ruling could lead to direct pay from schools for athletic participation.
  4. Q: What’s the NCAA’s stance on this ruling? A: The NCAA has traditionally opposed classifying athletes as employees, arguing it would fundamentally change the nature of college sports.

More Info

  1. Q: How might this ruling affect college sports programs financially? A: If implemented, it could significantly impact athletic department budgets, potentially leading to cuts in some programs or increased university costs.
  2. Q: Could this ruling affect all college sports equally? A: Likely not. Revenue-generating sports like football and basketball might be more affected than others.
  3. Q: What’s the next step in this legal process? A: The case will return to a trial judge for further fact-finding and potentially developing a test to determine employee status.
  4. Q: How might this ruling affect college sports in states like California? A: States with prominent college athletic programs, like California, could see significant changes in how they manage and fund their sports programs.
  5. Q: Could Congress get involved in this issue? A: Yes, some NCAA officials have called for Congressional intervention to clarify student-athletes status.
  6. Q: How does this ruling relate to other recent cases about student-athlete compensation? A: This ruling builds upon recent cases like NCAA v. Alston but potentially classifies athletes as employees rather than just allowing additional education-related benefits.

Conclusion

The Third Circuit’s ruling in Johnson v. NCAA represents a potential watershed moment in the history of college athletics. By allowing student-athletes to be classified as employees, it challenges fundamental assumptions about the nature of college sports and the relationship between athletes and their institutions.

For states like California, with its rich tradition of collegiate athletics and progressive stance on athlete rights, this ruling could accelerate changes already underway. As the case progresses, stakeholders across California’s higher education and athletic landscapes must closely monitor developments and prepare for potentially transformative changes in how college athletics operate.

The coming months and years are likely to see continued legal battles, policy debates, and possibly legislative action as stakeholders grapple with the implications of this landmark ruling. Whether through further court decisions, NCAA policy changes, or Congressional action, the resolution of this issue will likely shape the future of college sports for generations to come.

As we stand at this crossroads, one thing is certain: the world of college athletics is on the brink of potentially seismic change. How institutions, athletes, and governing bodies navigate this shifting landscape will determine the future of a beloved American institution and impact the lives of hundreds of thousands of student-athletes across the nation.

Related Terms: unofficial acts, former president, eighth amendment, grants pass, first amendment, opinions, justices,

Client Reviews

James Arrasmith is one smart attorney! He understood my problem and came up with a great solution right away. I can depend on him to listen and ask the right questions to get straight to my issues. His availability is...

Alan Murphy

Hiring James to handle my eviction / landlord tenant case is one of the best decisions I’ve ever made. He assisted me every step of the way and made the process smooth and easy. It was obvious that he truly cared about...

Monica Martínez alvarado

I've had a lot of attorneys in my life, and James is by far the best attorney that I've ever hired. He helped me with my case from start to finish and clearly explained the process to me without making it overly complex...

DD M

Great consultation, efficient, attorney. I needed possession of my home, Mr. Arrasmith acted swiftly and was able to provide me the information I needed to understand what could have been a lengthy process. Mr...

Nadia Faraci

James is an amazing attorney!! I had never hired a lawyer before (and was very nervous), but James took hours of his time to explain the entire procedure to me. He gave me a thorough consultation, and I was so impressed...

Ledi

James was the only person to answer the phone at 7am on a Saturday morning. My first phone call to him was as a scared and stressed woman with no idea on where to even begin to explain the sort of help I needed. James...

Renae Elise

James helped me with two landlord tenant issues. In both cases, I was able to expeditiously resolve my issue with the tenant. I appreciate his genuine care for his clients; a rare trait in an attorney. I would highly...

theresa26 r

I cannot begin to describe how amazing and reassuring it was to have James guide me through the most challenging moment of my life. When my mother let me know she would soon be passing from cancer and wanted to leave...

Tricia Matsis

James Arrasmith did a great job for me on my legal matter. From the first time I talked to him he was very professional and knew what he was talking about. I would recommend James Arrasmith to anyone who needs help with...

Alvin Warren

I can't express enough how much James put my heart at ease. He has really been dugiligant at getting things done vs what I have experienced before using other lawyers. Highly recommend James if your looking for trust...

Jeremy Rasmussen Finnif Skate

James Arrasmith is a fantastic attorney. He is respectful and knowledgeable! Always very responsive and really takes his time explaining everything so you can understand it. I would highly recommend you meet with James...

Andrew Noseworthy

Mr. Arrasmith was cocounsel on a complex case, but was able persuade a notoriously bad judge to go along with the resolution. He’s a fine lawyer that works hard to make sure he is prepared to win the case. I highly...

James Pearson

Highly recommend choosing James. He was extremely responsive always making sure I understood every step of the process. In addition, he would periodically check in with me before important decisions needed to be made.

Tulsi

He is experts and reasonable attorney.

Ahmad Ali Shinwary

Best attorney I ever worked with... he takes time to explain the whole process and and will make sure you are happy with his work. We did a living trust and he helped me with an eviction case. I highly recommend him!

Alina Cojocari

James is an excellent attorney. I recommend him to anyone who's looking for someone who cares and wants to help win their case! :)

Allen Esealuka

I had a few questions about my situation, I needed some legal advice so I went ahead and contacted the Arrasmith firm. James was very helpful and polite, I asked him about a dozen questions and will be pursuing llegal...

Amber Styles

I cannot begin to describe how amazing and reassuring it was to have James guide me through the most challenging moment of my life. When my mother let me know she would soon be passing from cancer and wanted to leave her...

Tricia

James is a professional with outstanding customer service. We hired him to take care of an issue for us and he delivered as promised. I highly recommend him if you have any ongoing legal issues. James it's absolute...

Aztec Gold99

He will go out of his way . The best lawyer in Sacramento!I don’t know what I would do without lawyer james.

Bryan

Very professional, understanding and willing to assist in any way he can. I am most definitely keeping James as my one stop shop lawyer.

Brad Naylor

I am so happy I found Mr. Arrasmith's law firm! I couldn't have been happier with my decision to hire James. He took my case from point A to point Z and kept me informed every step of the way. If I ever need an attorney...

Bryce Colburn

James is a wonderful addition to the legal community. He is hard working, bright and ethical. He goes the extra mile for his clients.

Caitlin Ross

He was a great attorney.

Devon Campbell

I contacted Mr. Arrasmith regarding a disability related inquiry for a family member. Mr. Arrasmith provided excellent and immediate responses to my questions. I felt as though he truly cared about the well being of my...

Anonymous

Great consultation, efficient, & positive attorney. I needed possession of my home, Mr. Arrasmith acted swiftly and was able to provide me the information I needed to understand what could have been a lengthy process...

Nadia

I had a few questions about my situation, I needed some legal advice so I went ahead and contacted the Arrasmith firm. James was very helpful and polite, I asked him about a dozen questions and will be pursuing llegal...

Amber

James is a great guy. He has helped me to start a very difficult case. That I was nervous to do. He has made me Confident that he will fight hard on my case.

Rachel

I am so happy I made a decision to hire James to help me with my case. He was very professional and assisted me every step of the way. I was able to get a very positive settlement on my case. I couldn’t be happier!

Ledi

James has helped me tremendously with my legal matter by going over all the forms with me and clearly explaining how to complete them. He has made everything easy for me. I am very glad I called James!

Patty

James did a great job helping us with getting our settlement. Followed up in timely manners and updates always provided. Thank you for your help!

Anonymous

Gave James smith a call late at night with an immediate answer, he is very quick to respond and was eager to answer any questions I had.

Erika

Mr. Arrasmith was great, he answered all my questions and was very helpful with my legal matter. Thanks again James.

Alvin

Mr. Arrasmith was great, he answered all my questions and was very helpful with my legal matter. Thanks again James.

Alvin

Mr. Arrasmith was cocounsel on a complex case, but was able persuade a notoriously bad judge to go along with the resolution. He’s a fine lawyer that works hard to make sure he is prepared to win the case. I highly...

James

I've had a lot of attorneys in my life, and James is by far the best attorney that I've ever hired. He helped me with my case from start to finish and clearly explained the process to me without making it overly complex...

Darren

James is a great lawyer! He is honest and very trustworthy. He will give you sound legal advice.

Jason Motto

Great service and customer service. Very professional too, thanks James and Maria!! Having a bilingual attorney who knows so many different aspects of the law is a BIG plus.

JC R

I found James online after an extensive search. He was knowledgeable and worked with me on a payment plan I could afford. I'm happy I picked him for dealing with my awful landlord. He helped me get the settlement I...

Jenn C

Lawyer James Arrasmith For me He very was very approachable and likeable as a person . I felt very comfortable with the knowledge, and information shared for our case. which we got desired result from. He to me is a...

John Davis

James is a wonderful lawyer and person! He is hardworking , ethical, quick and effective lawyer! He knows what he is doing.

Ka Saelee

James Arrasmith always does amazing job helping me with my landlord and tenant cases!! He is my go-to attorney when I need assistance in evicting tenants. I like how he also represents tenants as well as landlords - so...

Kerry Davis

No one likes to need an attorney, but when you do, James is amazing to have in your corner! He is smart, professional, patient, and always makes sure his client is comfortable and confident with the next steps. I refer...

Kristen Trexler

Best lawyer he will get the job done went out of his way totally

Larry Yabut

Mr. Arrasmith and his team are amazing. Mr. Arrasmith is very knowledgeable and has been amazing through our whole process. He treats people like a human being and not a paycheck, I would highly recommend him to...

Magan Mellinger

No one likes to need an attorney, but when you do, James is amazing to have in your corner! He is smart, professional, patient, and always makes sure his client is comfortable and confident with the next steps. I refer...

Kristen

I would highly recommend James. I did lots of research searching for a great Attorney in the area. He makes you feel hopeful during a difficult times. His knowledge and expertise was great!

Maria Guardado

I had a personal issue and needed to consult with a lawyer. James Arrasmith took his time to explain everything so that I could understand exactly what my options were and the best way to go about my next move. I would...

Mark Hodges

A Very Nice, Personable Attorney/Person!! He is Very Patient and Willing to Listen to My {Tour} Case/Problems>I would Highly Recommend James to Anyone Seeking Fair and Equitable Justice!! Mark, CA.

Mark Loeffler

Thank you Mr James for helping me. What a great attorney! If you need help call Mr Arrowsmith!

Marva Davis

I give James Arrowsmith Attorney at Law 5 stars not just because he supports and represents CAED (our Non- Profit Organization that works with children ) but also because of how decent a person I've found him ...

Marvell Wilson

I was sooooo nervous about my case until I called James. He literally made the entire process simple and easy for me. I cannot recommend him highly enough! He is the most amazing attorney I’ve ever had!

Peyton

James has helped me tremendously with my legal matter by going over all the forms with me and clearly explaining how to complete them. He has made everything easy for me. I am very glad I called James!

Patsa Hin-udom

I am Latina and my English is not very good, therefore the attorney made sure that there was an assistant who spoke Spanish and who translated everything he told me and answered all my questions. Excellent service, I...

Paula Barriga

James is fantastic! He answered all of my questions and gave me clear guidance. If you are looking for an experienced and knowledgable attorney, I highly recommend James. Amazing Lawyer!

peyton cooks

James has a very good heart. He takes his cases personally as if it was him. He is a very nice understanding guy

Rachel Ottley

James is very knowledgeable, professional, and dependable. He patiently guided me through my estate planning and pre-nuptial questions, and made both processes much easier for me to understand. Highly recommended.

Sanat Sahasrabudhe

James arasmith is an excellent attorney when I needed help or advice he was always there to answer my calls or emails a very kind person listens & cares.

Tariq Johnson

Thank you so much for being highly responsive. Making I understand every step of the process. As well as checking in with me before important decisions need to be made.

Tulsi Patel

Very friendly, personable, and professional. I was able to get through my legal issue relatively smoothly and had exceptional support through the entire process. Pricing was reasonable and the billing process was not...

V Cat

I had some legal questions, and contacted James Arrasmith Law firm. His response was quick, and very helpful.

vera vlasenko

I highly recommend James Arrasmith. He really listens to your needs & truly cares about his clients. He is very professional & provides great results!

Vicky Tisdale

Contact Us Now

CF-pic.png

(916) 704-3009